Tuesday, 19 March 2013

Lecture Post 1

The Public Opinion of Tasers

    Dr. Martin Holmes, during his lecture Secularism, Liberalization, and Multiculturalism in British Society, touched upon the mistaken use of Tasers by the UK police force on innocent citizens, likening this to corporal punishment. After delving into the contemporary British conversation on the topic, I found that the media and the public agree with Dr. Holmes. It is widely acknowledged, even by polar media sources, that Tasers are misused by the police in British society and should be further regulated. However, neither publication condemns Tasers as corporal punishment directly.

    The Guardian, a generally liberal publication, focuses their article on Colin Farmer, the 61 year old blind man mentioned by Dr. Holmes as a victim of senseless police Tasering.  The Guardian presents anecdotes of numerous innocent individuals who have been Tasered and suggests a number of solutions. Through an interview with Amnesty UK's Arms Programme Director Oliver Sprague, The Guardian presents the view that Tasers should be regulated through laws and rigorous police training. Sprague suggests that the officers should be informed about the weapon and its effects as well as the appropriate situations in which to use the weapon.  This article fits with Dr. Holmes's opinion that the senseless use of Tasers is contrary to the UK's policy on corporal punishment, though it does not specifically name "corporal punishment" as the reason for injustice. It is an individualistic and humanist article that draws its power from personal anecdotes rather than sweeping legal statements. This may explain the lack of questions posed regarding the legality of the weapon in relation to corporal punishment.

    The Telegraph, a generally conservative publication, takes a similarly cautious and negative stance on the control of Tasers. Rather than starting with Farmer's tale, which dominated the media's discussion on Tasers at the time, The Telegraph focuses their article on the use of Tasers against "vulnerable people" in general. This publication does present a few anecdotal tales of citizens threatening self harm who have been Tasered, but focuses mainly on the lawful use of tasers. The Telegraph takes a more diplomatic view than the Guardian, and presents the Association of Chief Police Officers' defense of Tasers as well as Amnesty International's suggestions for taser regulations. This publication does not present as condemning an analysis of Tasers as The Guardian and Dr. Holmes did. The article promotes the use of Tasers in "necessary" situations. This, therefore, would not present Tasers as corporal punishment, as The Telegraph promotes the legality of the weapon while defending the law, while corporal punishment is contrary to the law.


Carter, Helen. "Campaigners Raise Concerns over Increased Police Taser Use." The Guardian. 21 October 2012. Web.

Whitehead, Tom. "Concerns over Use of Taser Guns on Vulnerable People." The Telegraph. 25 December 2012. Web.

1 comment:

  1. I was going to reference this Guardian article as well in my post but couldn't figure out how to do within text links...ha ha. I also appreciate how you mention the skew of each journalistic publication. Although the skew or opinion of publications is normally more complex in America in my opinion, I feel that you have fairly referred to the context of each of these publications and the stance they take politically as far as it refers to your argument.

    ReplyDelete